|
|
||||||||
Address correspondence to Jude Abadie M.D., Ph.D.,Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 S. Columbian Way (S-113-Lab), Seattle, Washington 98108, USA; fax 206 764 2001; e-mail: judeabadie{at}medscape.com.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and
free light chain (FLC) concentrations in a Veterans Affairs (VA) population. We hypothesized that our older, mostly male, population should not differ in serum FLC ranges from levels previously established for younger male and female populations and that the assay would improve our screening protocol for plasma cell dyscrasias (PCD). Serum
and
FLC were assayed in 312 consecutive serum samples collected during a 16-week period from veterans whose clinical presentation indicated a need for serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) analysis. We reviewed our laboratory information system (LIS) files to evaluate the patients diagnoses and treatment status in conjunction with serum FLC levels. All assays and validation studies were conducted using an immunoturbidimetric method with a Roche/Hitachi 911 modular analytical system. The intra-assay variability (CV) was <5%, based on 13 replicate assays of 4 control samples and 1 blank sample. Of the 312 patients, the SPEP results were normal in 235 and abnormal in 77. Of the 235 patients with normal SPEP results, 37 had abnormal FLC values and 20 of these were diagnosed as PCD. Of the 77 patients with abnormal SPEP results, only 9 had diagnoses unrelated to PCD. Using the FLC assay in conjunction with retrospective reviews of medical records, we obtained an 86% detection rate of PCD. This detection rate increased to 100% when both SPEP and FLC results were considered. In conclusion, this study documents an important role for serum FLC assays in diagnosing and monitoring PCD in a VA population. Our results support previously established serum FLC reference ranges that were obtained in younger, male and female populations. Using the serum FLC results in conjunction with SPEP results improves the sensitivity and specificity for managing VA patients whose clinical presentation indicates the need to evaluate PCD.
Keywords: light chains, monoclonal gammopathy, myeloma, electrophoresis, plasma cell dyscrasia
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A new quantitative nephelometric assay for serum FLCs has been used in several clinical investigations of PCD. The assay detects circulating monomeric and dimeric
and
FLCs. These light chains are free" in that they are unbound to a heavy chain immunoglobulin. Serum levels of
and
FLCs, in conjunction with the FLC
/
ratio, have been used with a high degree of sensitivity and specificity to identify and monitor FLC disease. Additional clinical use of the FLC assay includes monitoring disease stage in systemic primary amyloidosis, nonsecretory multiple myeloma, light chain deposition disease, and light chain multiple myeloma [5]. In such diseases, the underlying PCD can be difficult to detect or quantify by serum protein electrophoresis [6]. While immunofixation is the current gold standard for detecting monoclonal FLCs, that assay is qualitative and has sensitivities that vary among laboratories. A sensitive and specific quantitative serum FLC assay may prove to be an important guide for monitoring and treating patients with light chain disease.
The clinical strength of the serum FLC assay as a pre-neoplastic marker may lie in its ability to assess the risk of progression from monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) to clinical PCD. This rate of progression is about 1% per year [7]. Specifically, an abnormal
/
ratio has been reported to be the major independent risk factor for disease progression from MGUS; patients with normal ratios have low risk and do not require long-term monitoring [8,9].
We evaluated the serum FLC assay in a population of mostly male Veterans Affairs (VA) patients and compared our findings to results from studies using slightly younger, mixed-sex populations. Most published studies include a population based on all-comers and therefore reflect a younger mean age group and contain more females than would be observed in a VA population. While PCD is generally classified as a disease of the elderly, serum FLC reference ranges that have been used clinically in many investigations were established in a population of 282 normal subjects (men and women) from 20 to 90 years old [10]. Although both
and
FLC levels increase with age, the
/
ratio remains constant as a function of age. Increases in the levels of both
and
FLC with advancing age have been attributed to declining renal function, inasmuch as significant increases in cystatin C were observed in the same patients. Increased FLC levels are also seen in conjunction with the incidence of MGUS, which has been reported to be ~1% in the general population >50 years of age and 3% in those >70 years of age [11].
We conducted this study to assess the utility of a serum FLC assay in our population of veterans whose clinical presentation led to a serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) analysis. We decided to use the established reference ranges for serum
and
FLC levels, hypothesizing that our older male population should not differ from other populations with respect to disease monitoring and test utility. Additionally, we evaluated the serum FLC assay on a Roche Hitachi 911 analyzer, an instrument not previously used in published studies describing the clinical utility of this assay.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and
FLC. A previous investigation reported no significant differences in levels of
or
serum FLC content or
/
ratio between fresh and frozen samples [12]. We queried our laboratory information system (LIS) for relevant medical record information that included SPEP results, sex, and age. If a patient had more than one SPEP during the collection time period, only the initial sample was used to represent the results presented in this study. We also used the LIS to determine patient diagnoses and treatment status. All procedures were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards established by the University of Washington Medical Center and the Seattle VA Hospital Institutional Review Board.
At the Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System assays of serum total protein concentrations were performed on the Hitachi Modular P analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) using the biuret technique. The clinical laboratory cites a reference range of 6.4 8.3 g/dl for serum total protein concentration. Serum protein electrophoresis was performed using agarose gels and acid blue stain on the REP 1 system (Helena Laboratories, Beaumont, TX). Densitometric scans of serum protein electrophoresis gels were evaluated by two observers. Reference values for serum protein electrophoresis were: albumin 3.3 5.1 g/dl; alpha-1 globulin 0.1 0.3 g/dl; alpha-2 globulin 0.6 1.4 g/dl; beta globulin 0.6 1.4 g/dl; and gamma globulin 0.6 1.8 g/dl. The presence of one or more distinct peaks not corresponding to the usual protein bands in the gamma or beta globulin regions indicated the possible presence of a monoclonal or polyclonal gammopathy. Samples containing monoclonal peaks were further evaluated by immunofixation (Sebia, Norcross, GA). Serum
and
FLCs were measured by immunoturbidimetry on a Hitachi 911 modular analytical system (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) using the FREELITETM human
and
kits (The Binding Site, San Diego, CA). The assay involves two separate measurements that result in the quantification of
and
FLCs. Serum
/
ratios are also computed. Patients with ratios >1.65 or <0.26 are identified as producing clonal
or
FLCs, respectively. The normal serum reference ranges are 3.3019.40 mg/L for
and 5.7126.30 mg/L for
. None of the results from this study were used for patient care. The assays were conducted during a 3-week period after all of the samples had been collected and after the validation studies had been completed (Table 1
). Group means were compared by the t-test. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values were calculated for results obtained by SPEP, the serum FLC assay, and the combination of both tests.
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
control gave the smallest CV at 2.39%, and the 54.0 mg/L
control gave the highest CV at 4.90%. The blank sample, which contained albumin (7 g/dl), yielded concentrations of 1.98 mg/L for
and 2.74 mg/L for
, with CVs <5.0% for each. Long-term inter-assay CVs did not differ from the intra-assay results (data not shown).
Table 2
lists the SPEP and FLC results for the 312 consecutive serum samples. In comparison to SPEP, the FLC assay results demonstrate higher percentages of true positives and true negatives and lower percentages of false positives and false negatives. Table 3
lists the overall sensitivities, specificities, and predictive values for SPEP, serum FLC, and both tests combined.
|
|
Of the 235 patients with normal SPEP results, 198 (84.3%) had normal
and
values and ratios in conjunction with unremarkable clinical history or disease state. These 198 samples are not identified in Fig. 1
, but the values would fit within the indicated box. However, 37 (15.7%) of the 235 patients with normal SPEP results were found to have abnormal
/
ratio, abnormal FLC levels, or both. These 37 data points are plotted in Fig. 1
. The log concentrations of serum
and
levels(mg/L) are plotted on the x- and y-axes, respectively. The boxed area represents the normal reference ranges for
and
. The parallel lines represent the range of normal
/
ratios.
|
/
ratio. These comprised 15 with multiple myeloma, 1 with lymphoma, and 1 with bladder transitional cell carcinoma. Of the 20 patients with a normal
/
ratio, 3 were previously treated for myeloma, and the remaining 17 had diagnoses that were unrelated to plasma cell disorders.
Fig. 2
shows the
and
FLC levels for a portion of the 77 patients with an abnormal SPEP result. Of these 77 patients, 20 had both an abnormal
/
ratio and a FLC level that was outside the reference ranges for
and/or
. Of these 20, 12 had a diagnosis of multiple myeloma, and 2 were diagnosed with marginal cell lymphoma. The remaining 6 patients included Waldenstroms macroglobulinemia, leiomyosarcoma, PCD osteomyelitis, or an unspecified diagnosis. Fifteen of the 77 abnormal SPEP patients had a normal
/
ratio with a FLC level that was outside the reference ranges for
and/or
. These patients were diagnosed with renal insufficiency, chronic anemia, smoldering myeloma with comorbidities, light chain disease, relapsed myeloma, or smoldering myeloma. The solid circles in Fig. 2
represent 6 of those 15 patients as well as 4 of the remaining 42 patients with a myeloma diagnosis but an abnormal SPEP and a normal
/
ratio with FLC values that were within the reference ranges for both
and
. The solid squares in Fig. 2
represent 9 of the 15 patients with a normal
/
ratio but a
and/or
FLC value outside the reference range. These included 3 patients with renal insufficiency, 1 with chronic anemia, and 5 with unspecified diagnoses.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The detection rate for the serum free light chain assay in this study was 86% (25 of 29 PCDs). This is consistent with the only other report of the use of the serum free light chain assay in a clinical setting [5], in which the overall detection rate was 80.5%. Differences between the patient populations may account for the small difference in detection rate between that observed in the present study and that previously reported. Whereas the current study included primarily patients with intact immunoglobulin myeloma, 40% of the patients in the study by Katzmann et al [5] had MGUS or nonsecretory myeloma. It has been reported that excess FLCs are detected in 93% of patients with intact immunoglobulin myeloma, while 82% of non-secretory patients produce excess levels of FLCs [12]. Therefore, the higher detection rate for the serum FLC assay in this study may reflect a different proportion of intact immunoglobulin myeloma patients, and signals the value of the serum FLC assay for detection and diagnosis of intact immunoglobulin myeloma.
In contrast to the detection rate for the serum FLC assay, the detection rate for SPEP was only 48% (14 of 29 cases ofPCD). However, if SPEP and the serum FLC assay were used together, the detection rate for PCD was 100% (33 of 33 cases), albeit with a higher false positive rate. Thus an abnormal SPEP was found in 77 patients, but only 18% of these had a plasma cell disorder. On the other hand, there were 4 false positives for the serum FLC assay in this study.
The specificity of the serum FLC assay in this study (99%) was clearly higher than for SPEP (77%). This indicates that the
/
ratio is a sensitive and specific marker for monoclonal gammopathy. As the
/
ratio is a measure of plasma cell clonality, it should not be surprising that an abnormal
/
ratio is specific for monoclonal gammopathies. Because a number of disorders and diseases can increase production of immunoglobulins, there was a significant number of false positive SPEP results. At the same time, there were also several false negative SPEP results. There were fewer false positive and false negative results using the serum FLC assay. Furthermore, combining the serum FLC assay with SPEP resulted in significantly improved sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. These results indicate an important role for the serum FLC assay in screening for monoclonal gammopathies.
The results of this study support our hypothesis that the established reference ranges for serum
and
FLC levels remain valid for an older male population such as that at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. We noted that the
/
ratio, as computed from results of the serum FLC assay, is a sensitive and specific marker for PCDs. Addition of the serum FLC assay to a screening protocol that uses SPEP improves the sensitivity and specificity of the protocol. This will likely result in improved management of patients whose clinical presentation is suspicious for PCD. Such improved management could result in longer life and more productive quality of life for patients with PCD.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. A. Katzmann, R. A. Kyle, J. Benson, D. R. Larson, M. R. Snyder, J. A. Lust, S. V. Rajkumar, and A. Dispenzieri Screening Panels for Detection of Monoclonal Gammopathies Clin. Chem., August 1, 2009; 55(8): 1517 - 1522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J.D. Robson, J. Taylor, C. Beardsmore, S. Basu, G. Mead, and T. Lovatt Utility of Serum Free Light Chain Analysis When Screening for Lymphoproliferative Disorders: The Experience at a District General Hospital in the United Kingdom Lab Med, June 1, 2009; 40(6): 325 - 329. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Siegel, E. Bilotti, and K. H. van Hoeven Serum Free Light Chain Analysis for Diagnosis, Monitoring, and Prognosis of Monoclonal Gammopathies Lab Med, June 1, 2009; 40(6): 363 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Abadie, K.H. van Hoeven, and J. M. Wells Are Renal Reference Intervals Required When Screening for Plasma Cell Disorders With Serum Free Light Chains and Serum Protein Electrophoresis? Am J Clin Pathol, February 1, 2009; 131(2): 166 - 171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P. Piehler, N. Gulbrandsen, P. Kierulf, and P. Urdal Quantitation of Serum Free Light Chains in Combination with Protein Electrophoresis and Clinical Information for Diagnosing Multiple Myeloma in a General Hospital Population Clin. Chem., November 1, 2008; 54(11): 1823 - 1830. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G P Mead, H D Carr-Smith, and A R Bradwell Free light chains Ann Clin Biochem, July 1, 2008; 45(4): 444 - 444. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Ramasamy Serum Free Light Chain Analysis in B-cell Dyscrasias Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci., January 1, 2007; 37(3): 291 - 294. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |