ACLS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, L.
Right arrow Articles by Breuer, F. U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, L.
Right arrow Articles by Breuer, F. U.
Annals of Clinical & Laboratory Science 34:471-475 (2004)
© 2004 Association of Clinical Scientists


Case Report

Signet-Ring Cell Carcinoma of the Ampulla of Vater

Lin Li1, Qiang-Hua Chen1, James D. Sullivan2 and Frank U. Breuer1
1 Departments of Pathology and 2 Surgery, North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, New York

Address correspondence to Frank U. Breuer, M.D., Department of Pathology, North Shore University Hospital, 300 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA; tel 516 562 4179; fax 516 562 4591; e-mail frankuwebreuer{at}aol.com.

Abstract

Signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) of the alimentary canal is a variant of adenocarcinoma that has a poor clinical prognosis. SRCC of the ampulla of Vater is extremely uncommon with <12 cases reported in the literature. SRCC of the ampulla of Vater occurs in an older age group (mean age 60 yr) when compared to SRCC of the stomach (under 45 yr), but is similar to SRCC of the large intestine. We report a case of SRCC of the ampulla of Vater with unusual histopathologic features in a 56-yr-old woman who presented with a small tumor at the orifice of the ampulla, associated with extensive lymphovascular invasion and multiple regional lymph node involvement.

(received 4 May 2004; accepted 25 August 2004)

Keywords: ampulla of Vater, adenocarcinoma, signet-ring cell carcinoma

Introduction

Adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater is rare, with an incidence of <6 cases per million persons per year [1]. It accounts for 0.2% of all gastrointestinal malignancies and 6% of periampullary malignancies, which include tumors of the pancreatic head, distal common bile duct, ampulla of Vater, and duodenum [2,27]. Signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) of the ampulla of Vater is an uncommon histologic type at this site. It was first described by Sekoguchi et al [3] in 1979. Nine more cases have been reported [410,26,28]. We report a woman with signet-ring cell carcinoma in the ampulla of Vater.

Case Report

A 56-yr-old woman presented with pruritus, weight loss, and obstructive jaundice. Abdominal ultrasound examination revealed obstruction and dilatation of the common bile duct (CBD) at the level of the head of the pancreas. Helical computed tomography (CT) showed a dilated CBD without a mass lesion (Fig. 1Go). Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) showed a patent but ulcerated ampulla. A biopsy taken during ERCP was diagnosed as intramucosal signet-ring cell carcinoma. Imaging studies (ie, mammography, computer-aided detection (CAD), CT of chest and abdomen, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the abdomen) did not reveal any visceral or breast malignancy. The patient underwent a Whipple resection. Following surgery, she received radiation (total dose of 5040 cGy) and chemotherapy, which was completed in March 2004. The patient is clinically well at one yr after surgery.



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Computerized tomogram (CT) showing markedly dilated common bile duct (1a) at the level of pancreatic head (1b). No mass lesion was noted. Du: duodenum; CBD: common bile duct; Pan: pancreas.

 
Pathological Findings

The Whipple resection specimen showed a 1.5 x 1.0 cm sessile ulcerated polypoid mass encroaching upon the orifice of the ampulla of Vater at the insertion of the distal common bile duct. Proximally, the lumen of the common bile duct was dilated to 1.4 cm and the wall of the common bile duct was markedly thickened. The head of the pancreas and the stomach were apparently free of lesions. The cut surface of the tumor was tan and firm; the tumor infiltrated into the wall of the duodenum.

Histologically, an in situ signet-ring cell carcinoma and an infiltrating adenocarcinoma admixed with numerous signet-ring cells were found (Fig. 2a–2cGo). The tumor involved the entire muscularis propria of the ampulla and focally extended into adjacent peritoneal adipose tissue. The infiltrating tumor showed >60% diffusely distributed signet-ring cells that contained abundant intracytoplasmic mucin and typical eccentric nuclei (Fig. 2cGo). The intracytoplasmic mucin stained positively with mucicarmine and D-PAS stains. The common bile duct, stomach, and pancreas were free of tumor. Lymphovascular invasion was present within the tumor. Eight of 12 peripancreatic lymph nodes were positive for metastatic adenocarcinoma without a signet-ring cell component (Fig. 2dGo).



View larger version (173K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Ampulla of Vater demonstrating intramucosal SRCC (2a, 100 x); higher magnification showing characteristic signet-ring cells with eccentrically located, hyperchromatic nuclei, and abundant intracytoplasmic mucin (2b, 400 x); admixture of signet-ring cells with infiltrating adenocarcinoma (2c, 400x); regional lymph node showing metastatic adenocarcinoma without SRCC component (2d, 100x).

 
Discussion

Signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) is a variant of adenocarcinoma recognized by the presence of >50% of the characteristic signet-ring cells with intracytoplasmic mucin and typical eccentrically located, crescent shaped nuclei seen by light microscopy [11,27]. Clear cell carcinoma such as renal cell carcinoma, clear cell type, can mimic SRCC histologically. However, the glycogen-rich cytoplasm in clear cell carcinoma is easily distinguished from the mucin-rich cytoplasm in signet-ring cell carcinoma by mucin and D-PAS stains, which were diffusely positive in our case.

Adenocarcinoma of the ampulla is unique due to its special epithelial composition. There are 3 different types of epithelium (ie, duodenum, pancreatic duct, and common bile duct) that become confluent in a narrow region of the ampulla of Vater [21,27]. Several large series of ampullary adenocarcinomas have been published [23,1619,2829]. However, SRCC in this location has rarely been discussed. Seifert et al [28] described 1 case in a series of 35 carcinomas of the papilla of Vater. Blackman and Nash [29] found 2 anaplastic carcinomas that contained signet ring cells. However, the extent of the signet ring cells in these carcinomas was unclear from the paper. As mentioned previously, >50% of tumor must comprise signet ring cells to qualify as a signet ring cell carcinoma.

Nine well-documented cases of SRCC of the ampulla of Vater are summarized in Table 1Go. Of the 9 cases, 8 were male. Seven of the patients were Asian, including 6 from Japan. The mean age at presentation was 60 yr (25 to 83 yr). This is 15 yr older than SRCC of the stomach, but similar to SRCC of the large bowel [1315,2324]. SRCC of the ampulla of Vater has generally been described without lymph node involvement or distant metastasis at the initial presentation. Furthermore, of 7 patients (including the current case) with documented follow-up information, 6 were alive without disease for periods of 6 to 24 mo at the time of publication. One patient presented initially with a bone marrow metastasis by a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with signet-ring cell features. The primary site was identified as the ampulla of Vater at autopsy [4].


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1: Well-documented cases of signet-ring cell carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater, including the current case.
 
Our case showed unusual clinical and pathological features. First, a distinct in situ SRCC component was noted. Intramucosal SRCC has not been previously described in ampullary SRCC. The signet-ring cells in our case were diffusely admixed with a moderately differentiated infiltrating adenocarcinoma. However, only adenocarcinoma without signet-ring cell was found in metastatic lymph nodes. Second, although it is believed that most cancers of the small bowel arise within a preexisting adenoma or are associated with atypical epithelium [13,18,25, 2728], none of the previous cases of SRCC of the ampulla identified an adenomatous or dysplastic precursor lesion in the adjacent mucosa of the duodenum, common bile duct, or cystic duct. Our case raises a question whether the in situ signet-ring cell component may be a true precursor lesion. Third, our case presented with a small tumor (1.5 x 1.0 cm) but had extensive lymphovascular invasion and involvement of multiple regional lymph nodes by metastatic adenocarcinoma without signet-ring cells. In 8 of 9 previously described cases, neither lymph node nor distant metastases were found.

SRCC can arise in many organs, particularly in the alimentary tract, where it occurs most frequently in the stomach and large bowel [1213]. In contrast to SRCC of the ampulla of Vater, SRCC of the stomach appears to arise from nonmetaplastic foveolar or mucous neck cells that proliferate as single cells or in small clusters with admixture of glandular elements in the deeper portions of the tumor [11]. A 26% incidence of SRCC in early gastric adenocarcinoma has been reported in a large series [12] in Japan. It has a tendency to develop in a younger age group (<45 yr) and is associated with a poor prognosis [11].

SRCC is an uncommon subtype of colorectal adenocarcinomas [1314], although an increasing trend of signet-ring cell carcinoma in the colon was observed by Henson [30]. Several large series reported a frequency rate of approximately 1% of SRCC in large bowel carcinomas [13,15,2324]. Unlike SRCC of the stomach, the mean age for SRCC of the large bowel ranged from 59 to 63.5 yr [15,2324]. An increased frequency of exophytic or well-circumscribed SRCC has been associated with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer syndrome (HNPCC) and in sporadic colorectal cancers displaying DNA microsatellite instability (DMI) [13]. The prognosis of colorectal SRCC is extremely poor [1314,2324]. The origin of SRCC of the large bowel is uncertain. Mai et al [15] reported that SRCC may arise from conventional adenocarcinoma, adenoma, "atypical" epithelium, or a combination of these epithelia, that is, a transformation at any level of a neoplastic colonic mucosa.

In summary, we report a unique case of signet-ring cell carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater with an intramucosal signet-ring cell component and extensive regional lymph node involvement. SRCC of the ampulla of Vater occurs in an older age group than SRCC of stomach but is similar to the age group of SRCC of the large bowel. Henson et al [30] reported an increasing incidence of diffuse type of gastric carcinoma, signet ring cell carcinoma in particular, in the United States during 1973–2000 based on data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program of the National Cancer Institute. We believe that the biologic behavior and pathogenetic mechanisms of ampullary signet-ring cell carcinoma need to be investigated further.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Myron Susin, M.D., for advice and assistance.

References

  1. Roder JD, Schneider PM, Stein HJ, Siewert JR. Number of lymph node metastases is significantly associated with survival in patients with radically resected carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Br J Surg 1995;82:1693–1696.[Medline]
  2. Howe JR, Klimstra DS, Moccia RD, Conlon KC, Brennan M. Factors predictive of survival in ampullary carcinoma. Ann Surg 1998;228: 87–94.[Medline]
  3. Sekoguchi T, Mizumoto R. Clinicopathological study of papilla of Vater. Geka Chiryo 1979;41:1–5.
  4. Nabeshima S, Kishihara Y, Nabeshima A, Yamaga S, Kinjo M, Kashiwagi S, Hayashi J. Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with signet-ring cells of the Vater’s ampulla, without jaundice but with disseminated carcinomatosis. Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi 2003;94:235–240.[Medline]
  5. Eriguchi N, Aoyagi S, Jimi A. Signet-ring cell carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: report of a case. Surg Today 2003; 33:467–469.[Medline]
  6. Hara T, Kawashima H, Ishigooka M, Kashiyama M, Takanashi S, Hosokawa Y. Signet-ring-cell carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: a case report. Hepato-Gastroenterol 2002;49:561–563.
  7. Tseng LJ, Ng Jao YTF, Mo LR. Signet ring cell carcinoma of major papilla. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2002;56: 733.[Medline]
  8. Arnal-Monreal FM, Lorenzo Patino MJ, Sacristan F, Ghanime-Saide G. Signet ring cell carcinoma of the Vater’s ampulla. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 1994; 85: 391–393.[Medline]
  9. Casella R, Rittmann WW, Meier R, Wegmann W, Widmer MK, Hunger T. Signet ring cell carcinoma of Vater’s papilla: a very rare malignancy. Helv Chir Acta 1993/94;60:987–990.
  10. Gardner HA, Matthews J, Ciano PS. A signet-ring cell carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1990;114:1071–72.[Medline]
  11. Lewin KJ, Appelman HD. Carcinoma of the stomach. In: Atlas of Tumor Pathology, Tumors of the Esophagus and Stomach. Third Series (Rosai J, Ed), Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, DC, 1996; Fascicle 18, p 205, p 209 and pp 287–291.
  12. Maehara Y, Sakaguchi Y, Moriguchi S et al. Signet ring cell carcinoma of the stomach. Cancer 1992;69:1645–1650.[Medline]
  13. Tumors of Intestine and Anus. In: Diagnostic Histopathology of Tumors, 2nd ed (Fletcher CDM, Ed), Churchill, Livingstone, Harcourt, London, 2001; vol 1, pp 332–337, p 370, pp 389–394.
  14. Riddell RH, Petras RE, Williams GT, Sobin LH. Epithelial Neoplasia of the Intestines. In: Atlas of Tumor Pathology, Tumors of the Intestines.,Third Series (Rosai J, Ed), Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, DC, 2003; Fascicle 32, pp 152–156, pp 161–162, pp 205–216.
  15. Mai KT, Isotalo PA, Guindi M, Burns BF, Parks W. Intestinal epithelial lesions associated with signet ring cell carcinoma of the colon and small intestine. Pathology 2002;34:51–56.[Medline]
  16. Dorandeu A, Raoul J-L, Siriser F, Leclercq-Rioux N, Gosselin M, Martin ED, Ramee M-P, Launois B. Carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: prognostic factors after curative surgery: a series of 45 cases. Gut 1997;40:350–355.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Todoroki T, Koike N, Morishita Y, Kawamoto T, Ohkohchi N, Shoda J, Fukuda Y, Takahashi H. Patterns and predictors of failure after curative resections of carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Ann Surg Oncology 2003;10:1176–1183.[Medline]
  18. Berger HG, Treitchke F, Gansauge F, Harada N, Hiki N, Mattfeldt T. Tumor of the ampulla of Vater: experience with local or radical resection in 171consecutively treated patients. Arch Surg 1999;134:526–532.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Talamini MA, Moesinger RC, Pitt HA, Sohn TA, Hruban RH, Lillemoe KD, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL. Adenocarcinoma of the ampullla of Vater, a 28-year experience. Ann Surg 1997;225:590–600.[Medline]
  20. Sugihara K, Muto T, Kamiya J, et al. Gardner’s syndrome associated with periampullary carcinoma, duodenal and gastric adenomatosis, report of case. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:766–771.[Medline]
  21. Dawson PJ, Connolly MM. Influence of site of origin and mucin production on survival in ampullary carcinoma. Ann Surg 1989;210:173–179.[Medline]
  22. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors, 6th ed (Sobin LH, Wittekind CH, Eds), Wiley, New York, 2002; pp 69–71, pp 90–92.
  23. Nissan A, Guillem JG, Paty PB, Douglas Wong W, Cohen AM. Signet-ring cell carcinoma of the colon and rectum, a matched control study. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42:1176–1180.[Medline]
  24. Messerini L, Palomba A, Zampi G. Primary signet-ring cell carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:1189–1192.[Medline]
  25. Imura W, Ohtsubo K. Incidence, sites of origin, and immunohistochemical and histochemical characteristics of atypical epithelium and minute carcinoma of the papilla of Vater. Cancer 1988;61:1394–1402.[Medline]
  26. Nagasawa S, Ueno N, Seki S, et al. Carcinoma of the duodenal papilla in a youth. Gastroenterol Endosc 1984; 26:1103–1109.
  27. Albores-Saavedra J, Henson DE, Klimstra DS. Malignant epithelial tumors of the ampulla. In: Atlas of Tumor Pathology, Tumors of the Gallbladder, Extrahepatic Bile Ducts, and Ampulla of Vater, Third Series (Rosai J, Ed), Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, DC, 2000; Fascicle 27, pp 259–316.
  28. Seifert E, Schulte F, Stolte M. Adenoma and carcinoma of the duodenum and papilla of Vater: a clinicopathologic study. Am J Gastroenterol 1992;87:37–42.[Medline]
  29. Blackman E, Nash SV. Diagnosis of duodenal and ampullary epithelial neoplasms by endoscopic biopsy: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study. Hum Pathol 1985;16:901–910.[Medline]
  30. Henson DE, Dittus C, Younes M, Nguyen H, Saavedra A. Differential trends in the intestinal and diffuse types of gastric carcinoma in the United States, 1973–2000: increase in the signet ring cell type. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2004;128:765–770.[Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, L.
Right arrow Articles by Breuer, F. U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, L.
Right arrow Articles by Breuer, F. U.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS