|
|
||||||||
Address correspondence to Giuseppe Sergi, M.D., Clinica Geriatrica, Ospedale Giustinianeo, via Giustiniani 2, 35100, Padova, Italy; tel 39 049 821 8492; fax 39 049 821 1218; e-mail giuseppe.sergi{at}unipd.it
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(received 13 September 2004; accepted 15 September 2004)
Keywords: total body water, extracellular water, fat-free mass, fluid overload, aging
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
What is known about hydration status in health and disease in adults cannot be applied to elderly people because of changes in body composition and fluid compartmentalization occurring with aging [4]. Several studies have demonstrated that aging coincides with a reduction in total body water (TBW) and intracellular water (ICW) due to fat-free mass loss and an increase in extracellular water (ECW) and ECW/TBW ratio [48]. These physiological fluid changes make it necessary to investigate normal hydration and fluid retention in the elderly with a view to distinguishing fluid imbalance from normality.
It is important to gain an exhaustive knowledge of fluid changes in the elderly with CHF, now that indirect, repeatable, and non-invasive methods for estimating fluid compartments, such as bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), have become available [911]. These methods could be used in clinical practice to assess fluid overload in CHF and the effects of medications.
The aims of the present study were to investigate fluid changes in elderly patients suffering from symptomatic heart failure by comparison with healthy elderly individuals, and to identify the fluid measurement that best characterizes fluid overload in elderly CHF patients.
| Methods and Materials |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects. In a case-controlled experimental design, we studied 72 elders divided into 2 groups: 34 CHF patients and 38 healthy subjects. The CHF patients (20 males and 14 females, mean age 83.9 yr, SD 6.9 yr) satisfied the clinical criteria for a diagnosis of CHF [12] and were recruited among patients admitted to the Geriatric Department of Padua Hospital for acute treatment of symptomatic CHF. We included only CHF patients in class III according to the New York Heart Association (NYHA); the patients all presented significant lower limb edema. In the CHF subjects, the ejection fraction averaged 40 ± 3%. CHF patients with fever, pleural effusion, hepatic failure, renal failure, dysproteinemia, or anemia were excluded.
The healthy subjects (18 males and 20 females, mean age 78.7 yr, SD 7.5 yr) were enrolled as a control group from outpatients coming to our Geriatric Department for a check-up. The good general health and fluid balance of these subjects was determined by their medical history, physical examination, functional ability in daily activities and biochemical parameters. These subjects had no cardiovascular, metabolic, or endocrine diseases, no water or electrolyte disorders, nor were they receiving diuretic treatment. The characteristics of the subjects are shown in Table 1
.
|
D2O concentration in plasma was determined using an FT infrared spectrophotometer according to Lukaskis method [13] as modified at our Institute [14]. The TBW value in liters was calculated using the following formula:
![]() |
where A is the quantity of D20 administered in mg, B is the D2O concentration in mg/L at the equilibration time, and 0.928 is the correction coefficient for non-aqueous exchangeable hydrogen in the body [15].
Bromide concentrations in plasma were measured by an energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) spectrometer. The corrected bromide space (CBS) was calculated using the following formula [16]:
![]() |
where 0.9 is the correction factor for the distribution of bromide in non-extracellular sites, 0.95 is the correction factor for Donnan equilibrium, and 0.94 is the correction factor for the concentration of water in plasma.
Body composition. Fat-free mass (FFM) and fat mass (FM) were determined using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) with fan-beam technology (Hologic QDR-4500W, Inc). A standardized procedure was used for positioning the patient and using the QDR software. The DEXA scans were analyzed with Hologic software (release #8.21) for body composition evaluation. DEXA is reproducible in determining soft tissue composition [17] and consistent for elderly subjects [18]. Fan-beam DEXA technology for measuring FM and FFM mass has also recently been validated [1923]. FFM and FM were expressed as the absolute values and as % of total body weight. The body weight resulting from the sum of fat tissue mass, lean tissue mass, and total body bone mineral mass was similar to the body weight determined by conventional weighing.
Statistical analyses. All analyses were performed using the SAS software (release #8.2) (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). On account of body frame differences between genders, the fluid compartment and body composition measurements were expressed as mean ± SD for each sex- or disease-specific group. To avoid bias in comparing subjects with different weight and FFM, relative measures (as %) were obtained from instrumentally-assessed variables considering FFM, FM, TBW, and ECW, all divided by weight, and TBW and ECW, both divided by FFM. The normality of the distributions was verified with the Shapiro-Wilk statistic. Differences in mean values of continuous variables between 2 groups were evaluated using Students unpaired t-test or approximate t-test, after testing for homogeneity of variances. The level of statistical significance for each 2-sided test was set as p <0.05.
Stepwise logistic regression was performed on continuous relative variables to ascertain the role of some fluid measures in predicting fluid retention states. To avoid confounding effects due to absolute differences in FFM, the TBW as % of FFM (TBW%FFM), ECW as % of FFM (ECW%FFM), and ECW as % of TBW (ECW%TBW) were entered in the sex-specific models as independent variables. CHF was considered the dependent dichotomous variable. Further regression analysis was performed entering these measurements as independent dichotomous variables, using the 75th percentile of their distribution in healthy subjects as the cut-off value.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
CHF patients had higher mean values for absolute and relative ECW measures than healthy subjects of either gender; eg, ECW%FFM (males: 39.3 ± 6.0 vs 34.1 ± 2.3; females: 45.7 ± 5.9 vs 34.6 ± 4.1) and ECW%TBW (males: 54.8 ± 5.7 vs 47.3 ± 3.4; females: 60.7 ± 6.0 vs 47.8 ± 5.1). Only the female patients had significantly higher TBW in liters, TBW%weight, and TBW%FFM values than the control group, however.
Among the fluid parameters tested, only ECW%TBW independently predicted fluid retention state by stepwise logistic regression (Table 3
), for both males and females (OR 1.5).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Some authors agree there is a relative increase in ECW associated with a relative decrease in ICW with aging [5,28]. These changes may be explained either by an increase in FM (where ECW/ICW is 4:1) or by skeletal muscle atrophy, both of which are characteristic of old age [4)]
Our healthy elderly subjects had similar values for TBW%FFM, ECW%FFM, and ECW%TBW, regardless of gender and differences in body composition, demonstrating a relatively constant fat-free mass hydration, so the hydration values of our control group could be useful for reference in the elderly to identify cases of dehydration or fluid retention.
In elderly patients with CHF, the clinical signs of fluid overload were confirmed by dilution methods that revealed an increase in body fluids, especially in females.
TBW%Wt does not seem useful in detecting fluid retention states. TBW as % of body weight is influenced by body composition, particularly by FFM/FM ratio, and men with CHF had a greater FM (albeit not significantly so) than healthy males, so their fluid retention could be masked by more fat influencing the TBW%Wt value.
FFM hydration, expressed as TBW%FFM, also fails to point to fluid retention, because a higher FFM value may be due to a higher TBW. For example, for a healthy subject a 10% increase in TBW due to water overload results in a TBW%FFM increase of only about 2%. Therefore, this ratio increases significantly only in severe fluid retention conditions, as seen in females with CHF. The comparison with other studies is difficult, because the relationship between body fluids and FFM has been inadequately studied in CHF patients.
Our results show that ECW is the most important compartment involved in fluid retention. This expansion of the extracellular compartment in CHF cases is confirmed by higher ECW%TBW values uninfluenced by any differences in body composition and fat mass. In fact, ECW as % of TBW was about 7% and 13% higher for CHF males and females, respectively, than for the control group.
Previous studies dealing with fluid distribution in CHF produced contradictory results, probably due to the degree of heart failure, the different methods used, and the clinical evidence of fluid overload. Steele et al [25] evaluated body fluids in 12 elderly patients with chronic heart failure and found no significant changes in TBW and ECW, compared to healthy elderly subjects, but their patients presented no clinical signs of fluid retention. Stellato et al [3] used a BIA method and found an increase in ICW and a decrease in ECW, by comparison with controls, in 23 adult males with end-stage heart failure, while TBW was nearly identical between patients and controls. As in Steeles study [25], these patients had no clinical signs of fluid overload, because they were receiving drastic diuretic therapy.
On the other hand, previous studies of body fluids in CHF patients with clinical signs of fluid retention gave results similar to ours. Aidargalieva et al [29] observed an increase in ECW in 32 patients with heart failure exhibiting signs of fluid overload. A previous study of ours [30] showed a higher ECW in middle-aged patients with fluid retention due to heart or kidney failure, but we did not distinguish between the 2 groups of patients. Soderberg et al [2] indirectly confirmed our finding that administering diuretics to patients with acute CHF induces a reduction in ECW that is the most important factor in their weight loss. The usefulness of estimating ECW as an index of fluid retention is also demonstrated by logistic regression analysis. ECW%TBW values above 50 are independently associated with 10-fold higher likelihood of fluid retention. We consider ECW%TBW a good parameter for identifying fluid retention since it is relatively constant in conditions of water equilibrium and is uninfluenced by gender or nutritional status.
The results of this study should be considered with caution, taking into account certain limitations. Since the inclusion criteria were very restrictive, only a small number of patients met the protocol conditions and the sample size was consequently limited. Since our aim was to evaluate unknown scatters in fluid between healthy elderly and CHF patients, we judged the information to be adequate. The effect of physical activity was not considered in relation to body fluid distribution, but the level of physical performance was similar (in terms of independence in activities of daily living) in all healthy subjects, while the CHF patients performed less well because of their heart disease. Alcohol intake was low in all subjects and similar in the 2 groups, so it was not considered in the statistical analysis.
In conclusion, elderly people with CHF have a fluid imbalance characterized by an increase in the extracellular compartment. Among relative measures of fluid distribution, ECW%TBW seems to be the best indicator of CHF, a 10-fold risk being associated with values over 50%. Future studies are needed to confirm these observations in elderly CHF subjects and to support the need for a routine use of non-invasive methods to quantify fluid imbalance and monitor the effects of medication on these patients.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. E. Dewey, D. Rosenthal, D. J. Murphy Jr, V. F. Froelicher, and E. A. Ashley Does Size Matter?: Clinical Applications of Scaling Cardiac Size and Function for Body Size Circulation, April 29, 2008; 117(17): 2279 - 2287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |