ACLS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keehn, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ahmad, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Keehn, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ahmad, N.
Annals of Clinical & Laboratory Science 33:324-325 (2003)
© 2003 Association of Clinical Scientists


Case Report

PET Scan Detects Prostate Cancer in a Patient with Hodgkins Lymphoma

Connie A. Keehn, John Seigne, Merle Wade, Margaret Szabunio and Nazeel Ahmad
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute and the University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida

Address correspondence to Nazeel Ahmad, M.D., Department of Interdisciplinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612-9497; tel 813 972 4673; fax 813 972 8495; e-mail ahmadn{at}moffitt.usf.edu.

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) is routinely used in the management of cancers such as lung, colorectal, esophageal, breast, lymphoma, and melanoma. In urologic oncology, the role of PET has been less well defined and is currently under investigation. We report the first case of PET scan detection of prostate cancer in a patient with Hodgkins lymphoma.

(received 25 April 2003; accepted 15 May 2003)

Keywords: prostate carcinoma, Hodgkins lymphoma, positron emission tomography

Case History

A 46-yr-old man with Hodgkin’s lymphoma, with bilateral axillary nodal disease, received chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Post-treatment computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) showed a complete response. Two years later, he presented with complaints of fatigue, fever, night sweats, and bone pain. Physical examination was significant only for a sub-centimeter left axillary lymph node. CT and PET were performed to search for recurrent disease.

The CT was unchanged, but the PET scan revealed an abnormal area of increased glucose metabolism in the left apex of the prostate (Fig. 1Go). The patient had no urinary symptoms; genitourinary examination, including digital rectal examination, was unremarkable. Transrectal ultrasound examination with prostate needle biopsies were then performed.



View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. PET scan shows an area of increased glucose metabolism in the left apex of the prostate (arrow).

 
Biopsy revealed prostatic adenocarcinoma in the left prostatic apex (Fig. 2Go). Radical retropubic prostatectomy and lymph node dissection were performed, revealing prostatic adenocarcinoma, Gleason Score 6 (3+3). The tumor presented predominantly as a small nodule in the left apex, with two separate microscopic foci within the right apex. There was no evidence of perineural or vascular invasion. All of the surgical margins were free of tumor.



View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Adenocarcinoma in needle biopsy of the left apex of the prostate (H&E, x 100 magnification).

 
Discussion

2-Deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG)-PET is routinely used in clinical practice to evaluate various cancers, including lung, colorectal, esophageal, breast, lymphoma, and melanoma [1]. However, in urologic oncology, the role of PET is less well defined and is currently an area of investigation.

Use of FDG-PET has been disappointing in the diagnosis of localized prostate cancer, probably because most prostate cancers have a relatively low glycolytic rate [1]. In addition, because the radiotracer is eliminated in the urine, the presence of FDG in the ureters and bladder can compromise the evaluation of adjacent structures [1]. However, studies have shown FDG-PET to be helpful in staging established cases of prostate cancer and in pre-operative evaluation of lymph node metastases [1,2]. Recent studies have used 11C-choline as the radiotracer, since it has minimal urinary excretion. This tracer has been successful employed to identify locally extensive and metastatic prostate cancer, but is inconvenient for general use in clinical practice because of the short half-life of 11C, which requires on-site radiotracer production [1]. New radiotracers are being developed, such as 18F-fluoroethylcholine, which may overcome this limitation [2].

Studies have shown that changes seen on PET scans correlate with changes in prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels, and may help guide therapeutic decision making [1]. Since salvage radiation therapy may be more effective if applied early (before the serum PSA level reaches 1 ng/ml), the possible use of PET scan as a diagnostic tool for early detection of disseminated or recurrent prostate cancer is encouraging [3]. Advances in PET imaging will undoubtedly improve the clinical evaluation and treatment of prostate cancer.

Our case demonstrated a prostate cancer that was diagnosed incidentally during PET imaging for Hodgkins lymphoma. The prostate cancer was organ-confined and occupied <5% of the sampled parenchyma. Early diagnosis and treatment of this patient’s tumor certainly improved his overall prognosis. We envision that imaging modalities will continue to improve and give other patients a better chance for early detection of prostatic carcinoma.

References

  1. Shvarts O, Han K, Seltzer M, Pantuck AJ, Bellldegrun AS. Positron emission tomography in urologic oncology. Cancer Control 2002;9:335–342.[Medline]
  2. Hara T, Kosaka N, Kishi H. Development of 18F-fluoroethylcholine for cancer imagine with PET: synthesis, biochemistry, and prostate cancer imaging. J Nucl Med 2002;43:187–199.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Kotzerke J, Gshwend JE, Neumaier B. PET for prostate cancer imaging: still a quandary or the ultimate solution? J Nucl Med 2002;43:200–201.[Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keehn, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ahmad, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Keehn, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ahmad, N.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS