HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hopfer, S. M. Articles by Makowski, G. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hopfer, S. M. Articles by Makowski, G. S.

Effect of Protein on Hemoglobin and Hematocrit Assays with a Conductivity-Based Point-of-Care Testing Device: Comparison with Optical Methods

Address correspondence to Gregory S. Makowski, Ph.D., Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, MC-2235, 263 Farmington Avenue, Farmington, CT 06030-2235, USA; tel 860 679 2596; fax 860 679 2154; e-mail makowski{at}nso1.uchc.edu.

Point-of-care testing (POCT) for blood hemoglobin and hematocrit (H/H) levels provides rapid patient assessment including the need for transfusion. Conductivity-based methods of blood H/H determinations can be influenced by plasma protein concentration. To assess this factor, we measured H/H levels at varying protein concentrations using two POCT instruments: iSTAT-1 (conductivity method) and Hemocue (optical method). These H/H results were compared to results obtained by our core laboratory hematology analyzer (GenS). Anticoagulated whole blood was centrifuged to sediment the red blood cells; the plasma was removed to serve as source of protein for mixing studies. A series of reconstituted samples was prepared with varying H/H and protein levels. To mimic hemodilution in clinical practice, samples were diluted with saline or lactated Ringer’s solutions. Following H/H analysis, the samples were centrifuged and protein determined in the supernatant plasmas. The H/H results obtained with the Hemocue instrument correlated exactly with those of the GenS analyzer at protein concentrations from 0.7 to 6.2 g/dl. The correlation was unaffected when hemodilution was performed with either saline (r = 0.999) or lactated Ringer’s (r = 1.000). The H/H results obtained with the iSTAT-1 instrument gave slightly less correlation with those of the GenS analyzer (r = 0.978 – 0.980) over this protein range. However, the iSTAT-1 results were generally lower than the GenS results, with discrepancies up to 2 g/dL for hemoglobin values and up to 4% for hematocrits at the lowest protein concentration. Therefore, it is recommended that H/H testing in patients with suspected hypoproteinemia or substantial hemodilution should be tested with a non conductivity-based method.

Keywords: point-of-care-testing, blood conductivity, hemoglobin, hematocrit

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. J. Myers and J. Browne Point of care hematocrit and hemoglobin in cardiac surgery: a review. Perfusion, May 1, 2007; 22(3): 179 - 183. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J Steinfelder-Visscher, P W Weerwind, S Teerenstra, and M H. Brouwer Reliability of point-of-care hematocrit, blood gas, electrolyte, lactate and glucose measurement during cardiopulmonary bypass Perfusion, January 1, 2006; 21(1): 33 - 37. [Abstract] [PDF]