ACLS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by El Shami, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by El Shami, A. S.
Annals of Clinical & Laboratory Science 34:67-74 (2004)
© 2004 Association of Clinical Scientists

Development and Validation of a Third Generation Allergen-Specific IgE Assay on the Continuous Random Access IMMULITE® 2000 Analyzer

Thomas M. Li, Tom Chuang, Susan Tse, Debra Hovanec-Burns and A. Said El Shami
Diagnostic Products Corporation, Los Angeles, California

Address correspondence to Thomas M Li, Ph.D., Diagnostics Products Corp., 5700 West 96th Street, Los Angeles, CA 90045-5597, USA; tel 310 645 8200, ext 2217; fax 310 645 9999; e-mail tli{at}dpconline.com. To request a reprint, the catalog number of this article is ZD121.

In vitro determination of allergen-specific IgE (sIgE) represents an important aid in the diagnosis and treatment of allergy. Improvements in laboratory methodology – the development of second, and now third generation assays for sIgE – have brought about major advances in speed, convenience, performance, and in the standards for judging performance. In this study, following the NCCLS I/LA20-A guidelines, we evaluated the analytical performance of a quantitative chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay for sIgE using the continuous random access IMMULITE® 2000 system. Defining features of this "third generation" sIgE assay include a true zero calibrator with a detection limit and functional sensitivity of 0.1 and 0.2 kU/L, respectively. The use of liquid allergens allows for complete automation, fast binding kinetics between IgE and the natural allergenic protein conformations, and a time-to-first-result of 65 min. Stable reagents and the low nonspecific signal associated with the liquid allergens and centrifugal wash technique permit extension of the measuring range to 0.1–100 kU/L, based on lot-specific, factory-calibrated master curves standardized to the WHO 75/502 reference standard. The assay demonstrated good precision and linearity over its measuring range. Relative to a first generation RIA (mRAST, from Hycor), clinical sensitivity, specificity, and concordance were 88%, 92%, and 90%, respectively (n = 812). Quantitative comparisons to a second generation assay yielded a linear regression relationship of IMMULITE 2000 = 0.99 (Pharmacia FEIA) + 1.99 kU/L, r = 0.859 (n = 169).

Keywords: immunoglobulin E, radioallergosorbent test, diagnostic accuracy, NCCLS protocols




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Annals of Clinical & Laboratory ScienceHome page
K. J. Kontis, A. Valcour, A. Patel, A. Chen, J. Wang, J. Chow, and N. Nayak
Correlation of the Turbo-MP RIA with ImmunoCAP FEIA for Determination of Food Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E.
Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci., December 1, 2006; 36(1): 79 - 87.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
M. Ollert, S. Weissenbacher, J. Rakoski, and J. Ring
Allergen-Specific IgE Measured by a Continuous Random-Access Immunoanalyzer: Interassay Comparison and Agreement with Skin Testing
Clin. Chem., July 1, 2005; 51(7): 1241 - 1249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Annals of Clinical & Laboratory ScienceHome page
M. H. Sohn, S.-Y. Lee, K. E. Lee, and K.-E. Kim
Comparison of VIDAS Stallertest and Pharmacia CAP Assays for Detection of Specific IgE Antibodies in Allergic Children
Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci., January 1, 2005; 35(3): 318 - 322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Association of Clinical Scientists.