ACLS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nuttall, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Lockitch, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nuttall, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Lockitch, G.
Annals of Clinical & Laboratory Science 33:443-450 (2003)
© 2003 Association of Clinical Scientists

Reference Limits for Copper and Iron in Liver Biopsies

Kern L. Nuttall1, Jan Palaty2 and Gillian Lockitch2
1 Consultant in Laboratory Medicine, and2 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children’s and Women’s Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Address correspondence to to Kern Nuttall, MD, PhD, 2112 Birch Circle, Bellingham, WA 98229, USA; tel 360 647 5212; e-mail kern_nuttall{at}yahoo.com.

Using 141 liver biopsy results (103 adults, 38 children) and a rank-order approach, the following reference limits were found: copper 55 µg/g dry weight, iron 1800 µg/g dry weight (adults only), and iron index 1.0. The study was made feasible by the fact that both copper and iron were measured as standard practice in every liver biopsy received for either test. The added analyte tended to contribute more to normal results. Specimens with elevations of both were infrequent (7 of 141) and significant elevations of both (copper >200 µg/g, iron index >2.0) were suggestive of contamination. Advantages of using patient data included studying specimens of limited availability and acquiring information on the distribution of elevated results seen in clinical practice. Disadvantages included increased uncertainty in the reference limits relative to a normal population. Although most of the study population consisted of patients referred for diagnosis of Wilson’s disease or hemochromatosis, the reference intervals were similar to those reported from autopsy studies.

Keywords: Wilson’s disease, hemochromatosis, hepatic iron index, trace elements, rank-order analysis







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Association of Clinical Scientists.