|
|
||||||||
Address correspondence to Kyungja Han, M.D., Department of Clinical Pathology, Catholic University Medical College, St. Marys Hospital, Youngdeungpo-gu, Youido-dong 62, Seoul, South Korea 150-713; tel 82 2 3779 1297; fax 82 2 783 6648; e-mail hankja{at}cmc.cuk.ac.kr.
We have developed a new and simple flow cytometric method to detect damaged red blood cells (RBCs) using anti-Hb in hypotonic solution. We studied a total of 200 patients, including 62 patients with schistocytosis, 8 postsplenectomy patients, and 108 healthy controls. Peripheral blood (2 µl) was stained with phycoerythrin-conjugated (PE) antihemoglobin antibody (anti-Hb) in 0.6% (w/v) NaCl solution, and analyzed by flow cytometry omitting the washing step. The proportion of RBCs stained by anti-Hb was 0.55% (SD ±0.23%) in normal controls and was significantly higher in patients with schistocytosis (2.95±2.95%, p <0.001). Six of 108 blood samples from normal controls and 60 of 62 samples from schistocytosis patients showed
1.01% stained RBCs (ie, values > mean+2SD of normal controls). The number of schistocytes counted by microscopic examination correlated with the proportion of RBCs stained by anti-Hb (r = 0.637, p <0.001). The proportions of stained RBCs in blood samples with malaria, spherocytosis, and elliptocytosis were also significantly higher than in normal controls. However, the results in postsplenectomy and iron-deficiency anemia (IDA) patients were not significantly different from the normal controls; the number of schistocytes in postsplenectomy patients was not related to the proportion of RBCs stained by anti-Hb. Based on these findings, flow cytometry of damaged RBCs using anti-Hb in hypotonic solution is a simple, sensitive, and accurate method to detect active hemolysis.
Keywords: hemolytic anemia, antihemoglobin antibody, flow cytometry
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Han, Y. Kim, S.-Y. Chung, M. Kim, and J. Lim How to Establish the Cut-off Values when Estimating Fragmented RBCs by Flow Cytometry Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci., October 1, 2002; 32(4): 404 - 405. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |