ACLS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tang, P.
Right arrow Articles by Hajdu, S. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tang, P.
Right arrow Articles by Hajdu, S. I.
Annals of Clinical & Laboratory Science 31:284-290 (2001)
© 2001 Association of Clinical Scientists

Ultrastructure of the Periductal Area of Comedo Carcinoma in situ of the Breast

Ping Tang, Saul Teichberg, Beth Roberts and Steven I. Hajdu
Department of Pathology, North Shore University Hospital-New York University Medical School, Manhassett, New York

Address correspondence to Steven I. Hajdu, M.D., Department of Pathology, North Shore University Hospital, 300 Community Dr.ive, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA; tel 516 562 4189; fax 516 562 4591.

We have previously shown that the different biological natures of comedo ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and non-comedo DCIS may, in part, be explained by the different expression patterns of tenascin, a large extracellular matrix protein, as observed by immunohistochemical studies. In the present study, we compared 8 cases of comedo DCIS with 5 cases of non-comedo DCIS by ultrastructural analysis, focusing on the myoepithelium, basal lamina, and tenascin-positive extracellular periductal stromal matrix. Our observations show that the comedo type DCIS frequently has an altered basal lamina, a looser and more disorganized collagenous matrix, and a general increase in stromal cellularity, including fibroblasts, lymphocytes, histiocytes and small blood vessels. In addition, in comedo DCIS, the lateral intercellular spaces between large myoepithelial cells that border the basal lamina are often expanded, compared to those of non-comedo DCIS. These results identify structural characteristics of comedo DCIS that may play a role in its greater preinvasive potential. They may also provide a structural basis for the different strategies that are needed for for clinical management of comedo DCIS, compared to non-comedo DCIS.

Keywords: breast carcinoma, ductal carcinoma in situ, comedo carcinoma




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Clin Lab SciHome page
P. Tang, X. Wang, L. Schiffhauer, J. Wang, P. Bourne, Q. Yang, A. Quinn, and S. I. Hajdu
Relationship between Nuclear Grade of Ductal Carcinoma in situ and Cell Origin Markers.
Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci., December 1, 2006; 36(1): 16 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Clin Lab SciHome page
P. Tang, S. I. Hajdu, C. C. Conte, and D. A. Filardi
Incidental Finding of Mammary Carcinoma in Lumpectomy Specimens
Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci., January 1, 2003; 33(1): 23 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Association of Clinical Scientists.