ACLS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Serdar, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kutluay, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Serdar, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kutluay, T.
Annals of Clinical & Laboratory Science 31:265-273 (2001)
© 2001 Association of Clinical Scientists

A Practical Approach to Glomerular Filtration Rate Measurements: Creatinine Clearance Estimation Using Cimetidine

Muhittin A. Serdar1, Ismail Kurt1, Fatih Ozcelik1, Muammer Urhan2, Seyfettin Ilgan2, Mujdat Yenicesu3, Levent Kenar1 and Turker Kutluay1
Departments of 1 Clinical Biochemistry, 2 Nuclear Medicine, and 3 Nephrology, Gulhane School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

Address correspondence to Muhittin A. Serdar, M.D., Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Gulhane School of Medicine, Etlik-06018, Ankara, Turkey; tel 90 312 304 3308; fax 90 312 323 4923; e-mail: maserdar{at}hotmail.com

Determination of creatinine clearance (Ccr) is not a reliable indicator of glomerular filtration rate (GFR), owing to tubular secretion of creatinine. It has been reported that Ccr measurements can approximate true GFR after cimetidine (Ci) administration. In this study, GFR was estimated by Cockcroft and Gault’s equation (CC-G) based on measurement of plasma creatinine, and Ccr was determined by the standard clearance equation using 4- and 24-hr urine samples (Ccr4 and Ccr24, respectively) in 17 patients and 10 healthy controls. After cimetidine administration (800 mg, 3 times daily), GFR values were recalculated at the same time periods (CCiC-G, CcrCi4 and CcrCi24, respectively). The results were all compared to those obtained by the 99mTc-DTPA protein-free double-sample method (CDTPA), which is a reference method for GFR determination. The coefficient of variation (CV%) for Ccr24/CDTPA was high before cimetidine administration; Ccr24 and CcrCi24 values were significantly different from CDTPA (CV 23.1%, Ccr24/CDTPA = 1.17, p 0.005; and CV 14.1%, CcrCi24/CDTPA = 0.92, p 0.006, respectively). Ccr4 values obtained before cimetidine ingestion showed large variation and were significantly different from CDTPA (CV 15.5%, Ccr4/CDTPA = 1.11, p 0.001). CcrCi4 values after cimetidine were similar to CDTPA (CV 6.9%, CcrCi4/CDTPA = 1.01, p 0.28). CC-G estimates were higher before cimetidine intake (CV 12.4%, CC-G/CDTPA = 1.21, p <0.001), whereas CCiC-G values were not significantly different from CDTPA values (CV 7.0%, CCiC-G/CDTPA = 1.01, p 0.67). This study shows that GFR estimations by CC-G, Ccr4, Ccr24, or CcrCi24 are insufficiently reliable. On the other hand, CCiC-G and CcrCi4 results are acceptable for true GFR estimations.

Keywords: glomerular filtration rate, creatinine clearance, cimetidine, Cockcroft-Gault equation, renal function




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
D. G. Warnock
Towards a Definition and Classification of Acute Kidney Injury
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2005; 16(11): 3149 - 3150.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Association of Clinical Scientists.