ACLS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hass, B.
Right arrow Articles by Littlefield, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hass, B.
Right arrow Articles by Littlefield, N.
Annals of Clinical and Laboratory Science, Vol 26, Issue 1, 18-30
Copyright © 1996 by Association of Clinical Scientists


Articles

Actions and interactions of nickel and magnesium on the transformation response of transformed cells in culture

BS Hass, LP McDaniel, and NA Littlefield

Nickel (Ni) and magnesium (Mg) exert separate and interacting effects on cells: Ni is toxic while Mg enhances the transformation response of transformed cells and protects from heavy metal-induced toxicity. Transformed rat liver epithelial cells were used in the soft agar (SA) assay to measure the effect of Ni and/or Mg on the expression of anchorage independence. Cells were exposed to +/- Ni and +/- Mg in a single passage of growth medium (GM) prior to assay in SA. The cells were then treated with +/- Ni and +/- Mg in the SA resulting in a 4 x 4 treatment matrix yielding 16 Ni/Mg combinations. Nickel was expected to decrease the transformation frequency (TF) and did so in 6 of the 16 cases. Magnesium was expected to enhance the TF independently of Ni; Mg increased TF values in 7 of 16 cases. The Ni-Mg interaction occurred in 11 of 16 cases. In general, Mg and Ni effects were observed more in GM than is SA. It is not evident from this study why the Ni, Mg, and Ni-Mg effects are not observed universally, but it is evident that metal-metal interactions are not simply defined or analyzed in biological systems. A refined factorial design may be useful in further separating such interactions. From the point of view of the implementation of the SA assay, in which test substances are typically dose previous to the implementation of putting the exposed cells in SA, it is clear that assay results can be markedly altered by the presence of the test compound in the soft agar.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the Association of Clinical Scientists.