ACLS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mark, H.
Right arrow Articles by Lathrop, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mark, H.
Right arrow Articles by Lathrop, J.
Annals of Clinical and Laboratory Science, Vol 25, Issue 4, 291-296
Copyright © 1995 by Association of Clinical Scientists


Articles

Fluorescent in situ hybridization assessment of chromosome copy number in gestational trophoblastic disease

HF Mark, MG Grollino, RA Sulaiman, and JC Lathrop

The concurrence of congenital trisomy 8 mosaicism and gestational trophoblastic disease in a forty-two-year-old Gravida IV, Para IV female has been described. In contrast to other cases in the literature, this patient had no additional confounding chromosomal abnormalities other than trisomy 8. To the best of our knowledge, this was the only reported case of constitutional trisomy 8 mosaicism associated with gestational trophoblastic disease, a rare gynecological disease entity in and by itself. The present report describes fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) studies for assessing chromosome 8 copy number on various patient tissues. The results of the FISH studies are compared with each other and with the original cytogenetic studies. It is concluded that the overall frequency of trisomy 8 cells is lower in the FISH studies using archival material than in the original conventional cytogenetic studies. This is true for the uterus and lung tissues with a metastatic tumor. The possible reasons for the somewhat different frequencies found between conventional cytogenetics via GTG-banding and interphase cytogenetics via FISH are discussed.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the Association of Clinical Scientists.