ACLS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pappas, A.
Right arrow Articles by Flick, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pappas, A.
Right arrow Articles by Flick, J.
Annals of Clinical and Laboratory Science, Vol 22, Issue 2, 125-132
Copyright © 1992 by Association of Clinical Scientists


Articles

Reticulocyte counting by flow cytometry. A comparison with manual methods

AA Pappas, RB Owens, and JT Flick

The reticulocyte count (RC) is a key diagnostic test in the evaluation, classification, and response to therapy of anemia. The RC, as determined by manual methods, has a frustrating inherent imprecision owing to its binomial counting statistics (i.e., low counts/low precision) and inaccuracy because of inter- and intraobserver variability as to what indeed is a reticulocyte. Fluorescent activated cytometric (FACS) analysis of reticulocytes by thiazole orange (TO) is a rapid, relatively simple, and precise method for counting reticulocytes. The automated method counts 10,000 cells or more vs. 1,000 cells counted by the manual method. Although inherently more precise, the FACS method may be inaccurate owing to the presence of Howell-Jolly bodies, nucleated red blood cells (RBCs), sickled cells, or giant platelets. The RC by FACS is well correlated with the manual method and the reference ranges are similar. A new parameter by FACS, the reticulocyte maturation index (RMI), provides an independent measurement of reticulocyte RNA content. Although the RMI does not correlate with RC either by FACS or manual methods, it does provide an independent parameter of erythropoietic activity and may be useful in predicting bone marrow engraftment or further subclassifying anemias. Determination by FACS of the RC offers significant advantages over manual methods in monitoring a patients erythropoietic response. However, one must be cognizant of potential pitfalls in the method.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the Association of Clinical Scientists.