ACLS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cate, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gadsden RH, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cate, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gadsden RH, S.
Annals of Clinical and Laboratory Science, Vol 21, Issue 4, 254-257
Copyright © 1991 by Association of Clinical Scientists


Articles

Serum alpha-fetoprotein: II. Clinical evaluation of two automated immunoassays for maternal serum screening

JC Cate and Sr Gadsden RH

A prospective clinical evaluation is reported for analysis of maternal serum alpha fetoprotein (s.AFP) testing by recently developed enzymeimmunoassay automated systems. The reference method for the study was a manual competitive binding radioimmunoassay which has been utilized by us in the Maternal Serum AFP Screening Program at the Medical University of South Carolina for the past five years. The patients were classified by weeks of gestation, 16 to 20. Mean concentrations of s.AFP increased with the increase in gestational week for each method; calculated multiples of median (MoM) values remained relatively constant regardless of the week of gestation. Mean and median concentrations of s.AFP measured by the radioimmunoassay and the coated tube enzymeimmunoassay methods showed close agreement, indicating the direct transferability of the methods for clinical purposes. The microparticle capture enzymeimmunoassay yielded higher results of s.AFP indicating the necessity for a correction if the method transfer is to be considered for sequential patient testing. (Multiples of median values for each method were uncorrected for maternal age, weight, or diabetes mellitus; lack of correction would not affect comparison of methods for clinical application.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the Association of Clinical Scientists.