ACLS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roeckel, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roeckel, I.
Annals of Clinical and Laboratory Science, Vol 19, Issue 6, 397-400
Copyright © 1989 by Association of Clinical Scientists


Articles

Do we have to rethink serologic markers used to diagnose hepatitis B infection?

IE Roeckel

The recent addition of testing volunteer blood donors for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) has raised questions not apparent when such testing is applied to hepatitis B (HB) infected patients. The review of published studies, and our own, demonstrates that it is difficult to evaluate false positive results. Some patients appear to lose antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) but not antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc), thus raising the possibility of disease transmission. It is anticipated that additional investigation of individuals positive for anti-HBc only by response to hepatitis B vaccine permits clarification of their immune status and absence of infectivity.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the Association of Clinical Scientists.