Annals of Clinical and Laboratory Science, Vol 19, Issue 2, 133-138
Copyright © 1989 by Association of Clinical Scientists
Comparison of fluorescence polarization immunoassay, enzyme immunoassay, and thin-layer chromatography for urine cannabinoid screening. Effects of analyte adsorption and vigorous mixing of specimen on detectability
P Dextraze,
WC Griffiths,
P Camara,
L Audette,
and
M Rosner
Four commercial assays for the screening of cannabinoids in urine were compared. Urine specimens from 93 selected subjects were run by fluorescence polarization immunoassay on the Abbott TDx; by enzyme multiplied immunoassay with two Syva EMIT assays; and by thin-layer chromatography with the TOXI-LAB system (Marion Laboratories). The TDx cannabinoid threshold can be set anywhere from 25 to 150 micrograms per L. Twenty-five micrograms per L was chosen for this study. The thresholds for EMIT are fixed at 20 micrograms per L for one assay and 100 micrograms per L for the other. The detection limit for TOXI-LAB, according to the manufacturer, can be anywhere from 5 to 50 micrograms/L, depending on the specimen. Urines, positive by at least one method, were further analyzed by gas chromatography with mass spectrometry (GC/MS), The detection limit for the GC/MS method was 10 micrograms per L. The results showed a few false negatives and unconfirmable positives; in general, correlation was considered acceptable. Dose-response curves comparing TDx and EMIT gave paralell results, with comparable cross-reactivity for the major metabolite, 11-nor-delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol-9-carboxylic acid (delta-9-THC-COOH). A dose-response study of TOXI-LAB using delta-9-THC-COOH also gave acceptable results. Adsorption to glass was investigated using spiked urine; a 27 percent reduction in concentration was caused by this phenomenon. Foaming of spiked urine caused by vigorous mixing resulted in a reversible 89 percent apparent reduction in concentration.