ACLS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cannon, D.
Right arrow Articles by Paige, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cannon, D.
Right arrow Articles by Paige, S.
Annals of Clinical and Laboratory Science, Vol 18, Issue 5, 378-383
Copyright © 1988 by Association of Clinical Scientists


Articles

Serum haloperidol and neuroleptic receptor levels in chronic psychosis

DJ Cannon, DE McMillan, JE Newton, EP Fody, WS Metzer, M Claybrook, L Couch, and SR Paige

Serum haloperidol and serum dopamine blocking activity were measured, and steady state levels were compared in 22 chronic male schizophrenic patients. Haloperidol levels were measured by high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC), and dopamine blocking activity was measured by a radioreceptor assay (NRRA). Clinical status was determined by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS). Patients were stabilized on individual doses of haloperidol for at least three weeks and dosages ranged from five to 200 mg per day. All measures were determined on two occasions, one week apart. All measures (AIMS, BPRS, HPLC, and NRRA) showed a high degree of repeated test reliability. The behavioral measures showed a high degree of interobserver reliability on both occasions. There were significant correlations at both time points among haloperidol dosage, serum haloperidol levels, and dopamine blocking activity. Although the correlations between serum levels measured by HPLC and NRRA were positive and significant on both occasions, they never accounted for more than 58 percent (coefficient of variation) of the total variance.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the Association of Clinical Scientists.