ACLS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knight, J.
Right arrow Articles by Crockett, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Knight, J.
Right arrow Articles by Crockett, H.
Annals of Clinical and Laboratory Science, Vol 18, Issue 5, 374-377
Copyright © 1988 by Association of Clinical Scientists


Articles

Increased urinary lipoperoxides in drug abusers

JA Knight, RK Pieper, SE Smith, and HH Crockett

Urine lipoperoxides were measured, as the malondialdehyde-thiobarbituric acid adduct, by "high performance" liquid chromatography in men who tested positive for any of the common "drugs of abuse." Urine malondialdehyde concentrations were within the reference range in those urines containing barbiturates and amphetamines. On the other hand, significant urine malondialdehyde elevations were associated with those testing positive for marijuana (p less than 0.005), cocaine, opiates, benzodiazepines, and in those urines containing multiple drugs (p less than 0.001). The mechanism of tissue damage by these drugs is not necessarily by lipid peroxidation, since their primary toxic effects might result in cellular injury by an alternative mechanism; the observed increased lipid peroxidation could be a secondary phenomenon following tissue injury.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the Association of Clinical Scientists.