ACLS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sherman, M.
Right arrow Articles by Chaplin, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sherman, M.
Right arrow Articles by Chaplin, A
Annals of Clinical and Laboratory Science, Vol 18, Issue 1, 19-23
Copyright © 1988 by Association of Clinical Scientists


Articles

Response of red blood cell control materials to altered testing conditions

ME Sherman, CF Arkin, and A Chaplin

While many features are regularly considered in selecting control reagents, the responsiveness of these products to methodologic errors is frequently overlooked. To address this issue with regard to commercially prepared whole blood cell controls, mean cell volume (MCV) determinations were performed on several preserved red blood cell controls and fresh blood in the presence of various artifacts. The effects contaminating the isotonic diluent with water, saline, or bleach were compared. Although our results indicate that preserved and fresh RBCs generally behave similarly, large differences were observed in the responses to hypotonic stress among controls and between controls and fresh specimens. As this may have clinical relevance, our data highlight the need for testing the responsiveness of controls to commonly encountered methodologic variables as part of the routine evaluation of these products.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the Association of Clinical Scientists.