ACLS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lum, G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lum, G
Annals of Clinical and Laboratory Science, Vol 15, Issue 1, 55-60
Copyright © 1985 by Association of Clinical Scientists


Articles

Use of C-terminal parathyroid assays in a large metropolitan hospital

G Lum

The use of C-terminal parathyroid (C-PTH) assays, performed at a commercial laboratory, was evaluated for one year at Charity Hospital, New Orleans. Of 72 patients, the most frequent diagnosis was primary hyperparathyroidism (1 degree HPT) (n = 17, 24 percent), followed by malignancy (n = 15, 21 percent), chronic renal disease (n = 10, 14 percent), and thiazide diuretics (n = 5, 7 percent). In the 1 degree HPT group, all were hypercalcemic (mean serum calcium, 11.6 ml per dL) and had elevated C-PTH. Patients with malignancy had higher mean serum calcium levels than patients with 1 degree HPT. Three patients with malignancy had elevated C-PTH; two had suspected coexisting 1 degree HPT and neoplasm; and one had suspected pseudohyperparathyroidism. Patients with chronic renal disease undergoing dialysis treatment had the highest C-PTH recorded (all had elevated C-PTH) but only 50 percent were hypocalcemic. Three of the five patients on thiazide diuretics had increased C-PTH, indicating that the withdrawal of this drug may unmask underlying hyperparathyroidism. Appropriate reasons for ordering C-PTH include evaluation of hypercalcemia (n = 32, 44 percent) or hypocalcemia (n = 12, 17 percent); indicated clinical reasons not included in the hyper- or hypocalcemic groups, including chronic renal disease in patients undergoing dialysis or transplant (n = 5, 7 percent); in suspected 1 degree HPT, (n = 5, 7 percent); and in patients with renal stones (n = 2, 3 percent) or on thiazide diuretics (n = 2, 3 percent). Based on laboratory and clinical criteria, C-PTH assay was appropriately used in 81 percent of the patients surveyed (58/72).





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the Association of Clinical Scientists.