ACLS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burdash, N.
Right arrow Articles by Papadopoulos, V
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burdash, N.
Right arrow Articles by Papadopoulos, V
Annals of Clinical and Laboratory Science, Vol 13, Issue 1, 49-54
Copyright © 1983 by Association of Clinical Scientists


Articles

The Crithidia luciliae and Farr assays for the detection of systemic lupus erythematosus

NM Burdash, G Teti, and V Papadopoulos

The specificity and sensitivity of two commercial systems for the detection of anti-native deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) antibodies in the diagnosis of active systemic lupus erythematosus were evaluated. Sera containing antinuclear antibodies from 64 patients were tested by an indirect immunofluorescent antibody technique employing the protozoan Crithidia luciliae as substrate and immunoradioassay based on the Farr technique. Twenty one patients had active systemic lupus erythematosus, 21 had other collagen vascular diseases, and 22 had miscellaneous non-collagen vascular diseases. The immunofluorescence test was 100 percent specific and 66.7 percent sensitive for systemic lupus erythematosus, whereas the radioimmunoassay was 90.7 percent specific and 80.9 percent sensitive. There was agreement between methods in 57 of the 64 (89.1 percent) sera tested.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the Association of Clinical Scientists.