ACLS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hawker, C.
Right arrow Articles by Di Bella, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hawker, C.
Right arrow Articles by Di Bella, F.
Annals of Clinical and Laboratory Science, Vol 10, Issue 1, 76-88
Copyright © 1980 by Association of Clinical Scientists


Articles

Radioimmunoassay for intact and carboxyl-terminal parathyroid hormone: clinical interpretation and diagnostic significance

CD Hawker and FP Di Bella

The phenomenal growth in our knowledge of parathyroid hormone (PTH) physiology, chemistry and radioimmunoassay in the past 15 years has produced a significant increase in the use of the assay in the clinical laboratory evaluation of patients with disorders of calcium homeostasis. Recent experience with assays that have specificities for different regions of the amino acid sequence of the hormone and that can thus measure different portions of the total immunoreactivity in blood suggests that there may be different clinical applications for such assays. This report describes two different radioimmunoassay procedures and the clinical experience with each and suggests how each assay may be utilized in clinical evaluation of possible parathyroid dysfunction. The assay for carboxyl-terminal PTH is more useful in the differential diagnosis of the possible causes of hypercalcemia, the intact PTH assay is preferred in selective venous catheterization for preoperative localization of hyperfunctioning tissues, and both assays have usefulness in the evaluation of patients with hypocalcemia. In chronic renal failure, the considerations are more complex. In many patients, the intact PTH assay is preferred for monitoring the clinical course; however, in other patients the carboxyl-terminal PTH assay has been more useful. The best assay for each patient must be determined by initial evaluation with both assays.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1980 by the Association of Clinical Scientists.